Political Entrepreneurs

The Economic Engine of Political Change

Ronald Coase and Spectrum Liberalization

September 4th, 2013 by Wayne Leighton

Over at MRUniversity, Alex Tabarrok has a short  video lecture on Ronald Coase and Spectrum Liberalization. Highly recommended, this twelve-minute talk gives a nice introduction to how the electromagnetic spectrum operates, and how government rules for its use have evolved over time. Coase, who passed away Monday, did more than anyone to help make it clear that the rules for spectrum use could be like those for most other resources — based on property rights that are freely traded in markets.

Alex points out that, during the Clinton administration, Congress finally approved the use of auctions for spectrum use rights, an idea that Coase had essentially proposed in 1959.

For those interested in why this reform took so long to come about, and how it actually happened, check out the case study in chapter six of Madmen. Ed and I describe the various interest groups that opposed reform, how Coase’s idea slowly won over one group and then another, and how the most powerful and resistant opposition (represented by congressional committees with FCC jurisdiction) were finally brought on board as well. It’s a classic story of political change. Madmen concludes the story as follows:

In the end, an idea worked its way from academic scribblers to intellectuals to madmen in authority. The latter at first included stubborn FCC commissioners and later applied to politicians with an interest in the status quo. They were not Third World dictators; they were simply political actors who were rationally resistant to change. But once it was expedient to do so, the madmen in authority embraced the idea and the policies it represented. And consumers won.

One thought on “Ronald Coase and Spectrum Liberalization”

Comments are closed.

From the Pages of Madmen, Intellectuals, and Academic Scribblers (p.189, ch.7)

The most successful entrepreneurs know what they do well, they know the market and the opportunities within it, and they choose those activities that create the most value. This is true in economic as well as political markets.

From the Pages of Madmen, Intellectuals, and Academic Scribblers (p.178, ch.7)

[W]hen the right elements come together at the right time and place and overwhelm the status quo, it is because special people make it happen. We call them political entrepreneurs.

From the Pages of Madmen, Intellectuals, and Academic Scribblers (p.176. ch.7)

While we started this book with Danny Biasone saving basketball, we end it with Norman Borlaug saving a billion lives. These stories are not that different. Both faced vested interests, which were reinforced by popular beliefs that things should be a certain way—that is, until a better idea came along.

From the Pages of Madmen, Intellectuals, and Academic Scribblers (p.174, ch.6)

Because there was a general belief that homeownership was a good thing, politicians found the public with open arms.... Everybody was winning—except Alfred Marshall, whose supply and demand curves were difficult to see through the haze of excitement at the time, and except Friedrich Hayek, whose competition as a discovery procedure was befuddled... In short, once politicians started getting credit for homeownership rates, the housing market was doomed.

From the Pages of Madmen, Intellectuals, and Academic Scribblers (p.166, ch.6)

Everyone responded rationally to the incentives before them. In short, the rules that guided homeownership changed over time, which in turn changed the incentives of these actors. And bad things happened.

From the Pages of Madmen, Intellectuals, and Academic Scribblers (p.153, ch.6)

They understood the economics. The ideas had already won in ... the regulatory agency itself. All that remained to be overcome were some vested interests and a handful of madmen in authority.

From the Pages of Madmen, Intellectuals, and Academic Scribblers (p.146, ch.6)

If the idea for auctions of spectrum use rights had been part of the public debate since at least 1959, why didn’t the relevant institutions change sooner? What interests stood in the way?

From the Pages of Madmen, Intellectuals, and Academic Scribblers (p.121, ch.5)

When an academic scribbler comes up with a new idea, it has to resonate well with widely shared beliefs, which in turn must overcome the vested interests at the table. Many forces come together to explain political change, even though it may seem like coincidence of time and place.

From the Pages of Madmen, Intellectuals, and Academic Scribblers (p.120, ch.5)

It’s the rules of the political game that deserve our focus, not politicians’ personalities or party affiliations.

From the Pages of Madmen, Intellectuals, and Academic Scribblers (p.119, ch.5)

In short, ideas are a type of higher-order capital in society. Like a society that is poor in capital and therefore produces little consumer value, a society that is poor in ideas and institutions will have bad incentives and therefore few of the desirable outcomes that people want.

©2024 Wayne A Leighton & Edward López • Web Design by Barrel Strength